Tyler on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:25:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] It would be a shame for me to have to publish a ballot with no proposals in 25 hours, so... |
If we want to legislate, we ought to try to correct that new Transaction Rule paragraph that BP Oracularitied. I'd say it's a bit too strict on the definition of a Transaction. Maybe tomorrow I'll propose something to that end. Oh, and I color the below proposal Black. Oh, and I challenge the public display of the Ministry of Laundry, on the grounds that I believe I own 1 Black Sock still. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > I submit the following proposal titled "You want C Nomic? I'll give you C > Nomic!" and color it Baby Blue: > > {Rename Rule 4E83 "The Game of Duopoly". > > Amend Rule 4E83 to read: > > "This ruleset governs two identical nomics named "B Nomic" and "C Nomic". > Any change to the gamestate of one of these nomics happens simultaniously > in > the other one." > > Repeal Rule 4E84.} > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business