Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation #124 (was Re: Win!)

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I judge this consultation TRUE - Wooble did not cease to be a player, 
since B did in fact not dissolve into lawless chaos.

This is an attempt to follow the intent of Wooble's message of dismay:

> If we're going to accept this sort of idiotic "I say I do, therefore I
> do" stuff, what we do now is resign the game.  I do so.


Although "I do so" is found at the end, it is immediately following a 
statement that the mere claim of an event does not cause it to happen.

If this judgment is in error, Wooble may (as a valid player) resign via 
public forum.


Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:14 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> 0x44 wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> This is Consultation #124. I assign it to Priest 0x44
>>>>>
>>>>> Oracle BobTHJ
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I answer this consultation with the first one word answer that Wooble
>>>> submits to this Consultation. Oh, and this is to a public forum
>>>>         
>>> To the public forum, I missed BP's refresh proposal that changed
>>> spoon-discuss back to a private forum.
>>>
>>>       
>> I'm considering this Consultation to have gone unanswered. 0x44 ceases
>> to be Ordained. I re-assign this Consultation to Priest Codae.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
>>     
> Priest Codae has failed to answer this consultation and ceases to be Ordained.
>
> I re-assign this Consultation to Priest jayc.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business