Re: [s-b] Proposal: not so peculiar

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

I revise this proposal to add, at the end:

{{
In Rule 4E36, add this text at the end:
{{{
There exists a Property "Essential" with a scope of Rules.
}}}
}}

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Proposal, entitled "not so peculiar":
>
>  {{
>  Repeal Rule 4E10.
>
>  In Rule 4E11, add at the end:
>  {{{
>  A Property is an Attribute with a Range of True and False.  An Object
>  with a value of True for a given Property possesses that Property, and
>  an Object with a value of False for a Property does not possess that
>  Property.  The adjective form of an Property or its negation can be
>  applied to an Object to unambiguously denote whether the Object
>  possesses the relevant Property /*e.g., an Active Player is the same
>  as a Player who possesses the "Active" Property; a Non-Vested Player
>  does not possess the "Vested" property. */
>  }}}
>
>  In Rule 4E36, remove the text:
>  {{{
>  Rules that possess the Essential property are said to be Essential.
>  Rules that do not possess the Essential property are said to be
>  Non-Essential.
>  }}}
>
>  In Rule 4E57, replace "Size property" with "Size attribute".
>
>  In Rule 4E28, remove the text:
>  {{{
>  The group of players that currently possess the Active property may be
>  called the Active Players. The group of players that currently possess
>  the Vested property are the Vested Players.
>  }}}
>
>  In Rule 4E36, remove the text:
>  {{{
>  Rules that possess the Essential property are said to be Essential.
>  Rules that do not possess the Essential property are said to be
>  Non-Essential.
>  }}}
>
>  }}
>
>  --Wooble
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business