Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation 105.

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 13, 2008 12:19 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  > I submit the following Consultation:
>  >  >
>  >  > {{
>  >  >     Does there exist a proposal numbered 355 as submitted by BobTHJ?
>  >  >
>  >  >     Reasoning:
>  >  >        Per Rule 4e2 states that a game object may only be created in
>  >  > accordance with the rules. Rule 4e15 establishes that Proposals are game
>  >  > documents. Per 4e7, Submitting a Proposal is a Game Action. Also Per
>  >  > 4e7, Game Actions must be posted to the Public Forum. The quasi-proposal
>  >  > numbered 355 never reached the Public Forum, and therefore cannot be a
>  >  > Proposal.
>  >  >
>  >  >     Unbeliever: BobTHJ
>  >  > }}
>  >
>  >  This is Consultation # 117 (maybe). I assign it to Priest Antonio (maybe).
>  >
>  >  BobTHJ
>  >
>  As of Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00 this consultation was declared
>  inconsistent. I re-assign it to Priest Billy Pilgrim.

I Answer this Consultation YES, deferring to the Reasoning behind the
Answer to a previous Consultation on the matter.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business