Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:54:28 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] Proposal: Emergencies are annoying


In Rule 4E50 (Public Displays), add a paragraph that reads:
{
A Player may, as a Game Action with 4 Support and no Objections within
2 rdays, Approve a Public Display. The Public Display in question must
either be provided in full as part of the Game Action or linked to on
a static web page [[e.g. permanent link on the wiki]]. When a Player
successfully Approves a Public Display, the Gamestate is changed to
reflect what it would be if the Approved Public Display were accurate
as of the time the Player attempted to Approve it. Any subsequent
changes (Game Actions or automatically triggered events) that would
normally be reflected in this Public Display are retroactively
simulated.
}

Any better way to word this? Does this have the potential to create
weird situations I haven't thought about?

My intent is to allow for us to reserve the use of emergencies
(looooooong) for cases where the rules are broken. Uncertain
gamestates can be handled in a quicker fashion.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business