Re: [s-b] [s-d] To assist my undead minion.

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > On Feb 11, 2008 11:20 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  >  > On Feb 11, 2008 9:04 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  >  > > I submit the following Consultation:
>  >  >  > > {
>  >  >  > > Question: Is BobTHJ guilty of the Murder of Ivan Hope?
>  >  >  > >
>  >  >  > > Reasoning: He is on a spree! A culinary spree! Look how he regales himself!
>  >  >  > > Burn him, I say, burn him!
>  >  >  > > }
>  >  >  > >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > This is Consultation #114. I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>  >  >
>  >  >  As far as I can tell, the defendant was aware of Ivan Hope's low HP at
>  >  >  the time of the gnawing.  I Answer YES.
>  >  >
>  >  This consultation became pondered on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00. Priest
>  >  Wooble would at this time assign a punishment except he is no longer a
>  >  player.
>  >
>  >  BobTHJ
>
>  Hmmmmm... As MoS, what to do with this? I have a proposal on the books
>  to assign default punishments when the priest cannot/fails to do so.
>  (hint hint, vote for it). Unfortunately it's not retroactive.
>
>  The way I see it, the way the rules currently stand, Wooble has failed
>  to fulfill an obligation (shall) but cannot be prosecuted for it since
>  he is no longer a player. There is nothing to indicate that BobTHJ is
>  to be punished under these circumstances.
>
>  Let's just call it a baby shower gift!

I assign a fine of 25 macks.

The rules don't state that a Priest ceases to be Priest when he ceases
to be a Player.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business