0x44 on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:19:34 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation 105.

Roger Hicks wrote:
> Ah, but I wouldn't say that the Enough Already quasi-proposal actually
> alluded to 4e41. An without a clear answer to Consultation #105, we
> can not know for sure.
> BobTHJ
Untrue, someone can submit another Consultation that does not include 
the offending reference. In fact, I'll do so.

I submit the following Consultation:

    Does there exist a proposal numbered 355 as submitted by BobTHJ?

       Per Rule 4e2 states that a game object may only be created in 
accordance with the rules. Rule 4e15 establishes that Proposals are game 
documents. Per 4e7, Submitting a Proposal is a Game Action. Also Per 
4e7, Game Actions must be posted to the Public Forum. The quasi-proposal 
numbered 355 never reached the Public Forum, and therefore cannot be a 

    Unbeliever: BobTHJ
spoon-business mailing list