Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract

Mike McGann on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:02:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract

To: "B:Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:02:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990802111541o5b573202pe80610d3ff6fe5f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840802111217v34752405l20ba29da32e2d7d9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20802111226r668e49c8kabcd946afba441ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840802111233k39cfb56dl3cb93d3c358d9834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802111354g49c2b0ahfebc618c620ddce9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990802111541o5b573202pe80610d3ff6fe5f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 11, 2008 6:41 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 4:54 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > This is Consultation #113. I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>
> I answer NO, for the reasons I laid out earlier, namely that a

I claim this Answer to be Consistent.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-b] New Contract
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: [s-b] Proposal: Fix Convictions
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] New Contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread