[s-b] Fwd: [s-d] Rule Categorization

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

TTPF

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 8 February 2008 09:37:10 GMT+01:00
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b]  Rule Categorization
> Reply-To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> On 7 Feb 2008, at 22:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> On Feb 7, 2008 9:33 AM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2008, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> This is Consultation #105. I assign it to Priest Ivan Hope.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: This consultation can only be found to be YES. If it is
>>>> found to
>>>> be NO, then it would not be a consultation, since both the message
>>>> that called it and this message include the text of the quasi-
>>>> proposal
>>>> "Enough Already!".
>>>>
>>>> Oracle BobTHJ
>>>
>>> I answer this consultation NO, with the Oracularity of "All  
>>> proposals
>>> with the title of Enough Already! as well as all Consultations
>>> numbered 105 are destroyed." If this Consultation didn't exist,
>>> wonderful; if it did exist, now it doesn't.
>>>
>> I claim this answer INCONSISTENT, as I despise that which shall not
>> be named.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
>
> I claim the answer to Consultation 105 to be Consistent
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business