ihope on Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:23:24 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [MoC] Ballot for nweek 138 |
On 31/01/2008, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 338: Dog Days (Ivan Hope) > > http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0338 > > Vote on 338: {{ SHELVE }} > > [[I think it's overpowered. Plus, say I win the auction this nweek and act > as lucky dog. If I read this right I am still lucky dog next nweek if no one > wins that auction. Also, really, nothing says I ever stop being lucky dog. > Do we ever get a situation where 4-5 players are all lucky dogs and everyone > ends up with 1.5 vote power?]] I did say "the Lucky Dog", with the intention of there being only one. I also said "if there was no winner, there becomes no Lucky Dog." > > 339: Contracts (Ivan Hope) > > http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0339 > > Vote on 339: {{ AGAINST }} > > [[Sounds way too easy to abuse. My contract declares causing me to win the > game to be a contract/game action. My contract takes that action. w00t.]] That very issue was brought up, and I amended my Proposal to fix that. Apparently, the wiki didn't get updated. I Stab the current Minister of Change with my Rapier. > > 341: Three (Ivan Hope) > > http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0341 > > Vote on 341: {{ FOR }} > > [[I think the rule is ludicrous, but just to see what it will do...]] Well, it does allow people to declare Attributes with a Scope of 3, which would seem to be the only permanent Game Object. --Ivan Hope CXXVII _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business