Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: Again the Rule

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Another way to fix the paradox :-D

I submit the following proposal, entitled "Big Voldy Style"

{
Create a rule with the following text:
{{
There is a Rule 4E41. The statement preceding the current statement takes
precedence over all rules claiming otherwise.

One second after this rule is created, replace the text of Rule 4E41 with
the following:
{{{
There is a Rule 4E41, but it cannot be named.

Any message to the Public Forum which refers to, mentions, or alludes to
Rule 4E41, its title, or its contents, is disregarded and treated as if it
had never reached the Public Forum.

[[This applies to specific references to Rule 4E41 or to a block of text
containing it, NOT to references to the Ruleset or Rules in general.]]
}}}

Two seconds after this rule is created, it is repealed.
}}
}

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business