Re: [s-b] Consultation 85: Answer

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I claim this answer to be CONSISTENT with the Cwn.

I also claim that 0x44 is not qualified to judge on Hose's clothing styles, as he is a meat popsicle.

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Anything McGee <anythingmcgee@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 8:04:29 PM
Subject: [s-b] Consultation 85: Answer

Greetings. My Answer to Cons. 85 is below:

Answer: TRUE.

Rule 35 states that a device "is a type of game object." Rule 2 states
that "Game Objects can only be created, destroyed, or modified if
allowed by the Rules, in a manner explicitly governed by the Rules."
And Rule 35 allows only one method of destroying a device: "The owner
of a device may destroy it by expressing the wish to do so in a public
forum."

Thus, the Rapier that was owned by the Player pikhq still exists in B
Nomic and there were more than four Rapiers at the time of the
Consultation's submission.

[[The Unbeliever in this Consultation also informally asked who the
owner of the loose Rapier is, and I choose not to provide a definitive
or official response to that question. My initial thought is that the
"device owner" Attribute is simply null. Perhaps a Proposal is in
order to clarify this sort of situation.]]



Cheers,
Anything McGee
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business