Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 01 January 2008 11:54:40 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> "If he deems it necessary the Priest may also submit as a game action an
> Oracularity detailing changes needed to correct the state of the game." -
> Rule 18
> 
> Priest Murphy has answered the consultation asking whether I currently have
> 11 Hit Point YES. He believes the state of the game is correct if I possess
> >10 hit points. His oracularity would reduce my hit points to 10. Therefore,
> I argue that Priest Murphy's oracularity does not "correct" the state of the
> game, as Rule 18 says oracularities should.
> 
> I declare the Answer and Oracularity for Consultation 80 to be INCONSISTENT
> with each other and with established doctrine.
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> 
> On Jan 1, 2008 4:06 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 31, 2007 9:15 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > I give Billy Pilgrim m5 as consolation.
> >
> >
> > Score!
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 

I, too, call consultation 80 as inconsistent with existing doctrine. Wheee!
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business