[s-b] Proposal: Chipping Away at Obsolescence

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

{
In Rule 18 (Judgment), under the subheading "Oracularities", remove the
paragraphs that read:
{{

If the answered question is in relation to the validity of a Game Action
that has been declared invalid, and the priest determines that action to be
valid, then the Oracularity should include a list of changes to current the
gamestate to simulate what it might be if the action in question had
actually occurred.

If the answered question is in relation to the validity of a Game Action
that has been declared invalid, and the priest determines that the action is
indeed invalid, then the Oracularity may contain a punishment for the player
who performed that action in the form of a gamestate change if in his
opinion he deems that the player intentionally attempted to perform an
action that is in contradiction to the rules.

}}

}

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business