| Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:37:53 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Consultation 72: Answer |
On Dec 27, 2007 8:55 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When consultation 72 becomes pondered: if consultation 72 is consistent, I > claim it is inconsistent. If consultation 72 is inconsistent, I claim it > is > consistent. > > "Ah, potential paradoxes. How they lighten my heart," says the AFO. How very ineffectual :-D I claim the answer to Consultation 72 to be Consistent with established doctrine. And I beg of all of you (read Hose, because I think you said you'd do it) to submit something to clean up this exact language mess. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business