Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I usurp the Ministry of Questions.

I usurp the Ministry of Goods.

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: B-Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2007 11:37:18 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions

I object to your usurpation of the Ministry of Questions.

--
0x44;



Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> The Oracle continues to defy me.
>
> I usurp the Ministry of Questions.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 11:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>> On Dec 9, 2007 7:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>    
>>> You are entirely correct about the Proposal Numbers, Oracle. I did mean
>>>      
>> to
>>    
>>> speak of Proposal 212. Your Proposal 202, however, was not included
>>>      
>> because
>>    
>>> its effects pale beside the might of Proposal 212, by which they are
>>> engulfed mercilessly.
>>>
>>> That said, Oracle, I bid you to explain why you find my Consultations to
>>>      
>> be
>>    
>>> unworthy, and to explain how I may correct them to bring their worth to
>>>      
>> an
>>    
>>> acceptable level.
>>>      
>> Partially because they were not phrased in the form of Questions.
>>
>> Of course, I'm happy to admit that it was mostly because I'm not
>> afraid to abuse the power granted to me by the rules for the greater
>> good of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.  It was
>> clearly not the will of the voters that the game cease to be called "B
>> Nomic" and if you can exploit one loophole in the Rules to try to
>> subvert that will I'm happy to exploit other loopholes to see that
>> it's not subverted.
>>
>>    
>>> Note that the Rules do not bind me to submitting a single Consultation
>>>      
>> per
>>    
>>> declaration of invalidity.
>>>
>>> Also note that unless you explain your ZOTTING satisfactorily, I shall
>>>      
>> usurp
>>    
>>> your position as Minister of Questions. No doubt all Players will agree
>>>      
>> that
>>    
>>> these Consultations must be seen through.
>>>      
>> True, but I'd say if I can't muster a second Objection from somewhere
>> then my intuition about the will of the Players is clearly wrong, and
>> I'd then welcome an Oracularity declaring that the game shall
>> henceforth no longer be called B Nomic and that we still have a
>> Membership Test defined even if it's not used.
>>
>> --
>> Geoffrey Spear
>> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>>    
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>  
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business