Daniel Lepage on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:11:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Cut it out! |
I propose: {{ __Stop that!__ Create a new rule: {{ __ Stop that! __ Mildly spamming spoon-business or spoon-discuss is Misdemeanor with a minimum penalty of 5m and a maximum penalty of 20m. Severely spamming either list is a Felony with a minimum penalty of 30m and a maximum penalty of 100m, plus loss of all points and/or mackerel that would be gained by the perpetrator as a result of passed proposals during that nweek. [[ You can make the case to the Priest as to whether what you're doing counts as spamming, and as to how severe it is. ]] }} }} {{ __ Contempt __ Create a new rule: {{ __Contempt of Court__ If a player submits 5 Consultations in the same nweek that are all ZOTTED, that player is Held in Contempt of Court. Being Held in Contempt of Court is a Misdemeanor. The minimum penalty for being Held in Contempt of Court is a fine of 10m. The maximum penalty for being Held in Contempt of Court is a fine of 60m, plus a limit of at most one proposal during the following nweek. }} -- Wonko On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Justin Ahmann wrote: > I obtain 10 trouts. > > I use 10 trouts to obtain a red-violet Jester's Cap. > > I take off my yellow-orange Jester's Cap. > > I ask Antonio which Jester's Cap I should wear. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2007 8:55:58 PM > Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Accessorizing > > I wrote: > >> pikhq wrote: >> >>> I create the following agreement: >> [snip] >>> 7) A Jester's Cap may be put on or taken off. >> >> So much for the precedent of CFJ 1628. > > Whoops, wrong nomic. In case you're interested, though: > > http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1628 > http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1629 > http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1630 > > (I think these were submitted for the purpose of manipulating > the everyone-gets-a-turn-to-judge mechanism. I forget whether > said manipulation was selfish, or to work around a rule bug.) > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business