Re: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70

Mike McGann on Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:48:06 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70

To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:48:01 -0500
In-reply-to: <6d741b990712081346g13a72ff1nf21e74f810c7d5c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990712081346g13a72ff1nf21e74f810c7d5c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

And one of these days I may be able to submit something that doesn't
contain a grammatical error.

> I ask that the Oracle wield the staff and ZOT Consultation 70 because
> it is was not phrased in the form of a Question.
      ^^ doh

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Accessorizing
Previous by thread: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] From the Office of Priestly Duties: Consultation 70
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread