Justin Ahmann on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:02:04 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal


Yet another revision (based mostly on input on the Oracularities):
{

All Devices not named "Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch" are destroyed.

All Blueprints are destroyed.

Add a rule to Section 1:

{
If an action is mentioned in the Rules, it is illegal for a Player to perform such action unless the Rules explicitly allow said action to be performed by the aforementioned Player in the current gamestate, or, in a sentence not part of Comment Text, describe such a Player performing said action.

The following actions are legal to perform unless such performance constitutes an illegal action due to a rule other than this one:
to designate, deem, consider, or say anything to be anything
to attempt to organize the Procedure described in Rule 0
to maintain a Public Display
to Forfeit the game
}

In the section of Rule 2-5 named, "The Answer," replace

{
If he deems it necessary the Priest may also submit as a game action an Oracularity detailing changes needed to correct the state of the game. 
}

with

{
The Priest may also submit an Oracularity as a Game Action, detailing changes to the gamestate required to uphold the Answer to the Consultation.  If the associated Answer is reversed, the Oracularity's Status is immediately set to Historical and its Success state is set to Lost.
}

Append to the section of Rule 2-2 entitled "Oracularities":

{
An Oracularity may not have Conficts or Dependencies.
}

Append to the end of Rule 2-2 in a section entitled "Impromptu Voting Periods":

{
As a Game Action with 2 Support, the Oracle or the Chairman may declare an Impromptu Voting Period for a Pending Oracularity.  This Impromptu Voting Period begins once the second Player to pledge his Support for this Game Action does so, and ends immediately after one of the following things happens:

Three ndays have passed since the beginning of the Impromptu Voting Period.
At least half of the Active Registered Voters have voted on the Oracularity.

At the beginning of the Impromptu Voting Period, the Oracularity becomes Open.  No other Proposals are affected by the beginning of the Impromptu Voting Period, although other Oracularities may be affected by their own Impromptu Voting Periods.

At the end of the Impromptu Voting Period:

If five or more Players have voted on the Oracularity, and the AGAINST Vote Power is greater than the FOR Vote Power, the Status of the Oracularity is set to Historical and its Success State to Lost.
If five or more Players have voted on the Oracularity, and the AGAINST Vote Power is not greater than the FOR Vote Power, the Status of the Oracularity is set to Historical and its Success State to Won.
If fewer than five Players have voted on the Oracularity, the Oracularity continues to be Pending.  Another Impromptu Voting Period may not be declared for this Oracularity.

Historical Oracularities are, for the purposes of Conflict and Dependency Culling, counted as having a Proposal Number of 0 and infinite Strength.

In all ways not discussed or logically implied by this rule or another, the Impromptu Voting Period is identical to an ordinary Voting Period.
}
[[I'm not entirely sure yet how to fit this in with Conflicts, Dependencies, and Vote Power.  Any suggestions?]]

Any Player or Faction by the name of "Agora", "Dice master", or "AFO" ceases to be a Player or Faction.

Rule 0-42 (if it exists) is repealed.

}



----- Original Message ----
From: Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:38:01 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal

Another revision:
{

All Devices not named "Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch" are destroyed.

All Blueprints are destroyed.

Add a rule to Section 1:

{
If an action is mentioned in the Rules, it is illegal for a Player to perform such action unless the Rules explicitly allow said action to be performed by the aforementioned Player in the current gamestate, or, in a sentence not part of Comment Text, describe such a Player performing said action.

The following actions are legal to perform unless such performance constitutes an illegal action due to a rule other than this one:
to designate, deem, consider, or say anything to be anything
to attempt to organize the Procedure described in Rule 0
to maintain a Public Display
to Forfeit the game
}

In the section of Rule 2-5 named, "The Answer," replace

{
If he deems it necessary the Priest may also submit as a game action an Oracularity detailing changes needed to correct the state of the game. 
}

with

{
The Priest may also submit an Oracularity as a Game Action, detailing changes to the gamestate required to uphold the Answer to the Consultation.  If the associated Answer is reversed, the Oracularity's Status is immediately set to Historical and its Success state is set to Lost.
}

Append to the section of Rule 2-2 entitled "Voting":

{
As a Game Action with 2 Support, the Oracle or the Chairman may declare a Voting Period for Oracularities only.  This impromptu Voting Period begins once the second Player to pledge his Support for this Game Action does so, and ends three ndays later.  In all other ways this Voting Period behaves like an nweekly Voting Period.
}
[[I'm not entirely sure yet how to fit this in with Conflicts, Dependencies, and Vote Power.  Any suggestions?]]

Any Player or Faction by the name of "Agora", "Dice master", or "AFO" ceases to be a Player or Faction.

The Player named Hose receives an M. C. Hammer commemorative CD.

Rule 0-42 (if it exists) is repealed.

}


----- Original Message ----
From: Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:09:49 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal

I am revising my Refresh Proposal (but I still think Hose (not Wooble) won.).

Proposal:
{

All Devices not named "Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch" are destroyed.

All Blueprints are destroyed.

Add a rule to Section 1:

{
If an action is mentioned in the Rules, it is illegal for a Player to perform such action unless the Rules explicitly allow said action to be performed by the aforementioned Player in the current gamestate, or, in a sentence not part of Comment Text, describe such a Player performing said action.

The following actions are legal to perform unless such performance constitutes an illegal action due to a rule other than this one:
to designate, deem, consider, or say anything to be anything
to attempt to organize the Procedure described in Rule 0
to maintain a Public Display
to Forfeit the game
}

Any Player or Faction by the name of "Agora", "Dice master", or "AFO" ceases to be a Player or Faction.

The Player named Hose receives an M. C. Hammer commemorative CD.

The Minister of Questions is required to update the "Justice" section of the B Nomic wiki as soon as possible.  [[I'm the Priest for Consultation 42, but I can't find its text.]]

Rule 0-42 (if it exists) is repealed.

}
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business