[s-b] Proposal: Challenge Flag is on the Field

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

I submit the following Proposal, titled "Challenge Flag is on the Field":

{{
Amend Rule 2-5 by removing the following text:
{{
That player submitting the consultation will be known as Supplicant
regarding that consultation.
}}
[[Moving this text to the paragraph below to prevent a forward reference...]]

Amend Rule 2-5 by replacing the following text:
{{
Any Player may, as a Game Action, submit a Consultation.

Consultations are Game Documents that contain a Question that is to be
Answered. The Question must be posed in such a form as to permit a yes
or no reply. Consultations may also contain:
}}
with
{{
Any Player may, as a Game Action, submit a Consultation if he does not
have zero Points. The player submitting the Consultation will be known
as Supplicant regarding that Consultation.

Consultations are Game Documents that contain a Question that is to be
Answered and the Answer to the Question the Supplicant believes to be
truth. The Question must be posed in such a form as to permit a yes or
no reply. Consultations may also contain:
}}

Amend Rule 2-5 by adding the following text under a heading titled "Resolution"
{{
When a Waiting Consultation becomes ZOTTED, the Supplicant loses 10
points. When a Waiting Consultation becomes Pondered and the
Consulation's Answer does not match the Supplicant's Answer, the
Supplicant loses 10 Points.
}}

[[To prevent a game of Agora breaking out in B, this is an attempt to
work Consultations like the NFL challenge flag. You should submit
Consultations only if you think you are going to "win"]]
}}

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business