Re: [s-b] [s-d] Answer to Consultation 39

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is Consultation Number 42 and I assign it to Priest Wonko.
I would ZOT this consultation since the AFO submitted a rather identical one
with more arguments, but the validity of the AFO consultation is in
question.

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 22, 2007 10:27 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Nov 22, 2007 8:14 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Interesting. I'm not sure how to do it, but if we decide to allow
> > non-singular-humans to gain playerhood, we might need some way of *not*
> > allowing them to play simultaneously as both a player and a faction...
> > Perhaps eliminate the concept of a faction altogether?
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> >
> It appears the AFO is both a Player and a Faction. I submit the
> following consutation:
> {
> The AFO is both a Player and a Faction at the same time, true or false?
> }
>
> If this is true, then each Ballotday, the AFO's vote power is set to 1
> (or 0 if they give allegience), and at the beginning of each nweek,
> it's vote power is set to 3/4 of it's previous value. Also, players
> may give allegiance to the AFO.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business