Re: [s-b] Action: Taking Ministry and Submitting a Consultation

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

I answer Consultation 35 "No."

Reasoning:

Rule 3-12 says that a device may have powers.  While the rule is badly
written, it seems clear that uniqueness (also not explicitly pointed
out as an "attribute") and powers are attributes of a device the same
as ownership is.

--Priest Wooble

On 10/27/07, Mike McGann <nomic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I take the Ministry of Questions.
>
> I submit the following as a Consultation:
> {{
> The Question:
> Is the Blueprint for the Device named the "Holy Hand Grenade of
> Antioch" invalid because it had no authority to define Powers for the
> Device?
>
> Unbeliever:
> Billy Pilgrim [[by the way, I like the new name. Easier to spell!]]
>
> Reasoning:
> Rule 3-12 says that a Blueprint "specifies a set of Attributes (except
> for device owner), Properties, and default states that can be used to
> define a device." The Rule does not explicitly state that it can
> specify Powers. A Power is not an Attribute, Property, or default
> state as defined by the Rules. Therefore, a Blueprint cannot specify
> any Powers for a Device.
> }}
>
> I assign this Consultation to a Consultation Number of 35.
>
> I select Wooble to be the Priest for the Consultation with a
> Consultation Number of 35.
>
> [[Any chance of getting a wiki account soon?]]
>
> - Hose and Oracle Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>


-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business