Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: Priestly Indecision

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

Wrong forum indeed.

2007/8/11, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Wrong forum?
>
> --
> Wonko
>
> On Aug 11, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> > I amend my proposal to read:
> > Add the following text to Rule 2-5:
> > "After a Priest answers a consultation assigned to them, but before it
> > becomes pondered, they may change their ruling on that consultation
> > if they
> > have not already done so. Doing
> > this causes all claims regarding its consistency to be erased and
> > the four
> > nday waiting period before it becomes pondered to start over."
> >
> > 2007/8/11, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >> On 8/11/07, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Add the following text to Rule 2-5:
> >>> "After a Priest answers a consultation assigned to them, but
> >>> before it
> >>> becomes pondered, they may change their ruling on that consultation.
> >> Doing
> >>> this causes all claims regarding its consistency to be erased and
> >>> the
> >> four
> >>> nday waiting period before it becomes pondered to start over."
> >>
> >> I like it, with the exception that it allows a priest to keep a
> >> consultation in a pending state forever.
> >>
> >> BobTHJ
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> spoon-discuss mailing list
> >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business