Re: [s-b] Consultations on Primo

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/3/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following consultations, requesting that the Minister
> assign them all to the same priest to answer:
> {
> Prior to Consultations 27 & 28 becoming pondered Primo Corporation was a Player.
> }

This is Consultation 31.

> {
> Primo Corpotation never took any action that would forfeit its status
> as a Player nor did any other game action or rule cause Primo
> Corporation to cease to be a player.
> }

This is Consultation 32.

> {
> Primo Corporation never took any action that would cause it to become
> a Faction as per rule 5-2
> }

This is Consultation 33.

> I believe the answers on all three of the above are quite clear, and
> thus should override the previous incorrectly answered consultations.
> In addition, as CEO of Primo Corporation, I formally protest the
> judicial activism shown in Cosultations 27 & 28, revoking Primo's
> status as a player regardless of the rules.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>


I assign Consultations 31, 32, and 33 to Charles.

-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business