Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: Better Checkpoints

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/18/07, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 7/18/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 7/18/07, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > No, 130 just changes the gamestate to what it would be if the Public
> > > > Displays were correct at the time before the proposal submitted. It
> > > > doesn't make them correct as of the time it passes, it makes them correct
> > > > as of the time they were last updated.
> > > >
> > > > I intentionally didn't want it to be as of the passage of the proposal,
> > > > since then somebody could change a public display intentionally to be
> > > > inaccurate 1 second before the end of voting.
> > >
> > > That's an interesting point, but consider this:
> > >
> > > The Public Display of the rules when this was submitted did not
> > > include the rules which we're voting on in the coming voting period.
> > > Thus if 130 takes effect it repeals any rules which are added to the
> > > ruleset before 130 becomes effective; the state of the game is changed
> > > to match the Public Display that didn't include them.
> >
> > No, p130 changes the gamestate to what it would be had the public
> > displays been accurate at the time. This includes changes made after
> > that time, because those changes would have been made anyway.
>
> I should say, it changes the gamestate *now* to what it would be *now*
> had the public displays been accurate *then*.
>
> --
> Wonko
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>

Ok, I get it.

I withdraw the proposal __Better Checkpoints__ and get myself some
more caffeine.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business