Peter Cooper Jr. on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:40:29 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Voting |
I vote as follows: > Untitled proposal to remove Rule 1: FOR. > Untitled proposal to Modify 1-10: AGAINST. I don't like the current wording either, but I think we need something that specifies that Game Actions are takeable, or else we may just end up with a definition of Game Actions and a procedure for taking them but no permissions anywhere to take them. And I'm hesitant to change this without really, really, thinking through the implications because making a mistake here could accidentally stop all Game Actions and that would be Very Bad. > Administrator is a Post AGAINST. I like the idea of generalizing our posts like this, but we need more changes than this to support it. For instance in r3-3 defining Posts, we have "If no other player holds a post then the Administrator is the PHD," among other things. This could quickly become a problem. > Fix Emergency Fix FOR. > Roll Call FOR. > Fast Rules AGAINST. > Get Off My Land FOR. -- Peter C. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business