Re: [s-b] [s-d] designation

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 26, 2007, at 12:05 PM, shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Comex, would you mind explaining that one?  Where in the rules does  
> it say
> that you can designate a public forum via a game action?

In Rule 1-9: {{ Each forum may be designated as one of the terms  
Private, Public, or Discussion. }}

However, I assume e's using r1-10:
{{
Text to the effect that "any player may do X" should be interpreted  
to mean that X is a Game Action; but such a declaration implies that  
only players may take the Game Action X (unless another declaration  
permits other Outsiders to as well).
}}

This doesn't cover the case when it simply says "x may be done"  
without specifying who can do it, so I would claim that designation  
is not implicitly a game action.

Furthermore, r1-9:{{ A Forum is any External Force that allows  
Outsiders to communicate. }}, so unless Comex can prove that multiple  
outsiders can use eir private wiki to communicate, it is not a forum  
to begin with.

But just in case, I Object to all Tidiness Lists and designate  
comex's private wiki as a Private forum.

-- 
Wonko


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business