Re: [s-b] $wgLogo

[bd <nomic@xxxxxxx>]

bd wrote:
> Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:
>> comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> I submit a RFJ.
>>> The statement is 'The proposal titled "populate $wgLogo" does not exist.'
>>> My Reasoning: It contains no changes to any Game Objects, which are the only 
>>> things that make up the game.  Therefore, it is not a Proposal per Rule 
>>> 2-2: "Proposals are Game Documents that list changes to be made to the game"
>> Interesting. This is RFJ 6, assigned to Optional.
>>
>> I hope judgment gets rendered quickly on this, or we may be in a bit
>> of a mess. If it's ruled true, then I need to renumber all succeeding
>> proposals if my reading of r2-2 is correct. (This is why we allowed
>> skipping proposal numbers in a prior version of the rules, so that if
>> the legality of a submission is questionable it can be assigned a
>> number of it does exist and have the number skipped if it doesn't.)
>>


I amend my proposal entitled __Monotonicity is rather dull, don't you 
think?__ to the following >-quoted text:
> Alter rule 2-2, replacing the sentence "For each new Proposal, the 
> Proposal Number shall be equal to 001, or if such Number is already in 
> use, to the greatest existing Proposal Number incremented by one." with 
> "Each new Proposal shall be assigned by the Administrator an integer 
> Proposal Number greater than all previously-existing Proposal Numbers."
> 
> Alter rule 2-5, replacing the sentence "For each new RFJ, the RFJ number 
> shall be equal to 001 or, if such Number is already in use, to the 
> greatest existing RFJ Number incremented by one." with "Each new RFJ 
> shall be assigned by the Administrator an integer RFJ Number greater 
> than all previously-existing RFJ Numbers."

[[ Got the braces wrong on the first one... ]]
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business