Mark Walsh on Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:15:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Back after a long absence...

Most revered Administrator:
Be advised that I find this posting to not be in accordance with the Rules.
I'll delete inapplicable matters.
> From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 11/24/06 5:52:33 PM
> Subject: [s-b] Back after a long absence...
> That is, my name shall be: all players
As it turns out, this seems to me to not be a uniquely
identifying name IAW Rule 1-4/0.

It appears that Proposals/0009 contains the phrase
... all players ...
connoted there to mean every current Player.

Since the Game Document Proposition 0009 existed
prior to the Request to Join by the Outsider once known
in a previous ERA as 'bd', the name {{all players}} does
not fulfill the requirements of 1-4/0: hence is invalid.

This could create a prceedent by which a proposition's
intent can be altered by a newcomer inadvertantly
(or vertantly, for that matter). 

[[ If indeed it was a ploy, bd, it was well thought out.
By my reckoning it can't fly per the rules. ]]


spoon-business mailing list