automailer on Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:21:32 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] [auto] FishFace votes |
FishFace's votes: Motion 302/4: Design Offering Undoing Bureaucratic Talisman : For Motion 303/3: Chad Handling And Rarity Issues Suggest Myriad Amendments : Against Rare is rare, Unique is unique. Motion 304/0: Require Immediate Puzzle Pod Location Execution : Against Too variable Motion 305/2: Set Amplitude Minimum Explicitly : Against Firstly: why kill them. Secondly: Amplitude shouldn't /depend/ on the HH. Motion 307/1: Talismanic Rarity Incongruities Plead Emendation : For Motion 308/0: Quest Queue Quite Quixotic : Against Motion 309/0: Attempt at Proposal : For Motion 310/1: Permitting Partial Pen Persistence : Against As with a few of the things around here, there isn't enough reward. Who really cares if they can make one more proposal in an nweek? Is it worth the cost of 40A? Motion 311/0: Uncommonly Good Talismans : Against Motion 312/0: A Fate Worse Than Death : For Motion 313/0: Superpowers, Take 3 (4?) : For For, although again, I don't know whether there's much point. For me, HH doesn't really entice because it doesn't go anywhere, though. (Sure, you can fight and try to gain superiority, but if you kill someone, it's pretty crappy on them) This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki. Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business