automailer on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:20:47 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] [auto] comex votes |
comex's votes: Motion 302/4: Design Offering Undoing Bureaucratic Talisman : Maybe Motion 303/3: Chad Handling And Rarity Issues Suggest Myriad Amendments : For Motion 304/0: Require Immediate Puzzle Pod Location Execution : Against If I'm holding a Puzzle Pod, I might as well vote against. Motion 305/2: Set Amplitude Minimum Explicitly : Maybe Motion 307/1: Talismanic Rarity Incongruities Plead Emendation : For Motion 308/0: Quest Queue Quite Quixotic : For Motion 309/0: Attempt at Proposal : For Motion 310/1: Permitting Partial Pen Persistence : For Motion 311/0: Uncommonly Good Talismans : For Motion 312/0: A Fate Worse Than Death : Maybe Motion 313/0: Superpowers, Take 3 (4?) : For Sounds good, although with Protective Ink, couldn't you make the other player have -1 AP if e previously had 1? This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki. Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business