flutesultan on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:56 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] RE: [s-d] Head of ministry prop. |
It would have given you, as Super, blanket authority over assets not in your purview. Triller > [Original Message] > From: <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx (discuss)> > Date: 8/10/05 4:39:09 PM > Subject: [s-d] Head of ministry prop. > > I'm curious as to why DQT and triller shot it down as no reason is give in their votes. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business