flutesultan on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:56 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] RE: [s-d] Head of ministry prop.


It would have given you, as Super, blanket 
authority over assets not in your purview.
Triller

> [Original Message]
> From: <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx (discuss)>
 > Date: 8/10/05 4:39:09 PM
> Subject: [s-d] Head of ministry prop.
>
> I'm curious as to why DQT and triller shot it down as no reason is give
in their votes.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business