Re: [s-b] Fwd: Open CFI's

[The Voice <voiceofnomic@xxxxxxxxx>]

My votes are identical to Wonko's-- REFUSED and AGAINST.

On 5/29/05, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On May 29, 2005, at 5.49 AM, Rainbow Wolfe wrote:
> 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: May 23, 2005 8:54 PM
> > Subject: Open CFI's
> > To: "BNomic [business]" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Raelus vs. Eugene, Nweek 88
> >
> > *Plaintiff:* Raelus
> >
> > *Statement:* Proposal 84 does not exist. Any gamestate changes in it
> > cannot
> > be made.
> >
> > *Analysis by Plaintiff:* The rules state that players can only have 5
> > pending/open proposals at any one time. Eugene's Talisman is still a
> > ball of
> > energy, so it has no effect on this. Since 84 is the sixth proposal,
> > creating it was an illegal game action.
> 
> REFUSED. Trivially true, long since fixed, and I dislike using CFIs for
> that sort of thing. If it's a question about ruleset interpretation,
> CFI it; if you just want to point out an error Eugene or I made, then
> you can just tell me.
> 
> > *Plaintiff:*
> > EugeneMeidinger<http://www.bnomic.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/
> > EugeneMeidinger>
> >
> > *Defendant:* Peter
> >
> > *Statement:* Peter's proprosal doesn't actually propose anything, is
> > full of
> > nonsense, makes no reference to the game and plagerized. Therefore p74
> > is
> > invalid.
> >
> > *Analysis by Plaintiff:* The rules say that each Proposal consists of
> > a list
> > of Gamestate Changes, that is, changes to the state and/or existence
> > of some
> > number of Game Objects. P74 contains one line in the interrogative
> > form and
> > the rest are declarative. A proposal needs statments in the imperative
> > form
> > in order to command any changes to the gamestate. Now even though one
> > is
> > allowed to use a declarative to demonstrate the existence of a game
> > object
> > this proposal does not even do that. This proposal does not reference
> > any
> > existing game objects nor does it declare the existence of new ones.
> > Instead
> > is it full of lines about eternal summer and rough winds and other such
> > rubbish. I therefore find this proposal not meeting its requirements
> > of a
> > proposal and has nothing to do with the game.
> 
> AGAINST. A proposal is a list of changes to the gamestate, but nothing
> prohibits an empty list. Plagarism, nonsense, and a lack of references
> to game objects are also not grounds for disqualification.
> 
> --
> Wonko
> 
> "Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer.
> Art is everything else we do."
>    -- Donald Knuth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 


-- 
.o0(The Voice)
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business