Raelus on Sun, 15 May 2005 12:21:35 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Re: I'll "Section 9" them |
On 5/15/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Section 3 is getting much too large, and much of it doesn't have much > to do with the actual "gameplay", that is, the timing, submission, and > passing of proposals, as well as a way to Win. > > So, I submit the following Tweak: > {{ > For the purposes of this Tweak, moving a rule from one section to > another means to remove it from the section it's in, put it in its new > section, and give it a new number as though it were a new rule being > created and put in that section. > > Move Rule 3-5 into section 9. > Move Rule 3-6 into section 9. > Move Rule 3-7 into section 9. > Move Rule 3-8 into section 9. > Move Rule 3-10 into section 9. > Move Rule 3-11 into section 9. > }} > > This is Tweak #6. > > (As a reminder, Tweaks 2 through 5 are also still pending, although > Tweaks #2 and #3 have already been objected to. Tweak #4 will resolve > if nobody Objects to it, and nobody's done anything on Tweak #5.) > <http://www.bnomic.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/CurrentTweaks> > > -- > Peter C. > "Could you please continue the petty bickering? I find it most > intriguing." > -- Data, "Haven", Star Trek, The Next Generation > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > I second this Tweak. -- -Raelus _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business