[s-b] Re: [auto] EugeneMeidinger amends p63

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx (Eugene) writes:
> pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.) writes:
>> Nope. The renaming of Gambly was a part of proposal 32, which failed.
> 
> Then http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-200505/msg00137.html
> has me very confused.
> So I shouldn't have 4 genechips right now?

Hmm. Yes, it does look like I made an error there. Proposal 32
definitely failed.
<http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-discuss/spoon-discuss-200505/msg00139.html>

So, yes, you should have one less genechip. Display updated. My
apologies, and thank you for bringing it up.

With the zillion changes every nweek, I'm bound to miss some things
here and there. Please feel free to double-check my work and make sure
I'm not accidentally breaking the rules.

-- 
Peter C.
"Never eat more than you can lift."
		-- Miss Piggy

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business