Jake Eakle on Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:06:11 -0600 (CST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached


I vote Yes on a and Yes but there should be distinct delineations of what is
comment and what is business, such as putting all non-business in square
brackets on b. 

On 11/26/04 2:16 PM, "Jeremy Cook" <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote:
>> Thus spake SkArcher:
>>> 
>>> What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-notices
>>> 
>>> This forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was automated
>>> would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The Reply
>>> To: header for s-n would be s-b
>> 
>> Hey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in "do-things-long-neglected" mode
>> for a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed.
> 
> That would be better than the current system. I don't think the
> business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to
> just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be
> useful.
> 
> I call a Straw Poll with two parts:
> 
> a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No
> 
> b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No
> 
> Zarpint
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business