Jake Eakle on Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:06:11 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached |
I vote Yes on a and Yes but there should be distinct delineations of what is comment and what is business, such as putting all non-business in square brackets on b. On 11/26/04 2:16 PM, "Jeremy Cook" <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote: >> Thus spake SkArcher: >>> >>> What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-notices >>> >>> This forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was automated >>> would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The Reply >>> To: header for s-n would be s-b >> >> Hey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in "do-things-long-neglected" mode >> for a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed. > > That would be better than the current system. I don't think the > business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to > just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be > useful. > > I call a Straw Poll with two parts: > > a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No > > b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No > > Zarpint > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business