Jake Eakle on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:23:01 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] harvest time |
In the abscence of someone ruling this all to be completely ridiculous, i throw them back at you forty-THREE times each. What NOW? I suppose just for fun I should formalize that: I throw all extant tomatoes at Phil forty-three times each. And I throw the tomato from the town square at wonko eight times, just to make absolutely sure. On 10/25/04 9:14 PM, "Phil Ulrich" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'll quote Wonko here, from the first tomato fiasco. > > "2) The Tomato Fiasco > > I cite CFJ 688, available at <http://www.bnomic.org/history.php?rn=688> > . (look at the bottom one, that's the most recent). This CFI (then > called a CFJ) was made in reference to the sentence > > "A player may drink a glass of champagne by announcing that e is doing > so in a public forum, this causes it to be destroyed." > > The claim was that this sentence allowed players to drink Champagne at > any time, regardless of whether they had champagne or even whether any > champagne existed. > > The ruling (see the appellate ruling, as the original judgment was > overruled) was that since "a glass of champagne" was a defined game > object, "to drink a glass of champagne" was not a standalone action but > instead an action performed upon a game object. > > By this precedent, "to throw a tomato" requires the existence of a > tomato, as tomatoes are defined under the rules. So nobody has thrown > any tomatoes." > > Note that tomatoes now exist. All that throwing a tomato means is that > I throw a tomato; nowhere in r1902 does it say I have to possess the > tomato. In fact, you can possess it, for all I (or r1902) care. > > I declare my intent to take my free throw against Personman, as well as > throw the other two tomatoes at him forty-two times each. > > --Phil > ======================================= > "Can anything be stupider than that a man has the right to kill me > because he lives on the other side of a river and his ruler has a > quarrel with mine, though I have not quarreled with him?" - Blaise > Pascal > > > On Oct 25, 2004, at 11:58 PM, Jake Eakle wrote: > >> First, because they have existed for two nweeks, all existing vines >> produce >> tomatoes. >> >> Secondly, I pick the tomatoes on the vines owned by myself, Phil, and >> Wonko, >> as well as the one on the Vine In The Town Square. >> >> Now, there are a couple possibilities here. Either the rules is >> interpreted >> as it was meant, and I now own four tomaatoes and phil and wonko both >> have >> Free Throws against me which they cannot use, or it is interpreted >> literally, and my having 'picked' these tomatoes is not defined, much >> as >> 'lay down' wasn't, to have have anything in common with the ordinary >> english >> phrase. In this case, i don't even own my the tomato on my own vine, >> since i >> have no means of getting it. After all, the rule merely says that vines >> "produce" tomatoes, and says nothing regarding ownership or location. >> Thus >> it follows that now I have picked four tomatoes, and own none, and >> Phil and >> Wonko do have Free Throws against me, but still cannot use them, as >> they >> don't have (and can't have) any tomatoes either. >> >> My case for the former scenario being the one that actually happens is >> that >> while 'lay down' in ordinary english really doesn't mean 'play' or >> 'put back >> in the deck', 'pick' really does mean 'remove from the vine and gain >> posession of'. If I were supreme dictator of this Nomic, I would say >> that's >> what happens. However, that's also the way it works out best for me, >> so I >> leave it up to you all. >> >> Also, just cause I haven't been given one yet, I draw a card. And I >> pay 5~ >> for my vine. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-business mailing list >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business