Daniel Lepage on Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:39:15 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Sweet Zombie Jesus on a Pogo Stick. |
Ok, here are answers and responses to everything that's tried to happen: 1) The Proposal MixupI goofed. My software, it seems, gets confused if one person starts submitting a proposal while another player is in the middle of doing so. I knew there was a chance this would happen, but I figured proposals are so rare these days that it probably wouldn't come up until after I had time to fix it.
'Home is where you hang your hat' is p1918; 'Down to Brass Tax' is p1919 and the other props are numbered one higher than the tracker seems to think. Thanks for resubmitting 1920 - that'll keep new numbers straight until I have time (probably tomorrow) to fix the prop records. And the software. Damn.
2) The Tomato FiascoI cite CFJ 688, available at <http://www.bnomic.org/history.php?rn=688> . (look at the bottom one, that's the most recent). This CFI (then called a CFJ) was made in reference to the sentence
"A player may drink a glass of champagne by announcing that e is doing so in a public forum, this causes it to be destroyed."
The claim was that this sentence allowed players to drink Champagne at any time, regardless of whether they had champagne or even whether any champagne existed.
The ruling (see the appellate ruling, as the original judgment was overruled) was that since "a glass of champagne" was a defined game object, "to drink a glass of champagne" was not a standalone action but instead an action performed upon a game object.
By this precedent, "to throw a tomato" requires the existence of a tomato, as tomatoes are defined under the rules. So nobody has thrown any tomatoes.
3) Zarpint's Tax ShelterI'd forgotten that Research could be given away, and that societies can hold it... Vines though, cannot be transferred under the rules, so you can't give your Vine to a society.
4) Other proposalsAraltaln's first prop probably wasn't meant to be a "New Rule". Also, its first statement looks more like a statement of fact than an action to take, so I would guess it has no effect. Nice Voidism, though.
Araltaln's second prop is clever, but I hate Cinquains in the rules and will probably vote against it.
5) Hand Jobs Norinel is still the Hand Job Master, as far as I know.And I have a concert in half an hour, so I'll take care of fixing proposals, etc. tomorrow.
-- WonkoHow can you prove whether at this moment we are sleeping, and all our thoughts are a dream; or whether we are awake, and talking to one another in the waking state?
-- Plato _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business