David E. Smith on 18 Feb 2004 01:39:33 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Spoon-business] Prop: kickbacks?

I propose:

{{__Steel-Toed Kickbacks__

Replace the text of Rule 155 with the following:

No proposal shall call for effects that discriminate in any way between
players based on their voting actions. If a proposal specifies such
effects, such effects shall not occur.

The ways in which a proposal may attempt to discriminate between players
based on their voting results include, but are not limited to:
* Explicit statement [[ i.e. "Everyone who votes for this gains X points,"
or "Everyone who voted against this loses X points" ]]
* Adding, changing, or repealing rules, such that the text of the Ruleset
or any Rulebook specifies instantaneous or recurring effects based upon
the results of a prop [[ i.e. "Everyone who voted for X gains Y points.
This rule repeals itself." ]]

If a proposal has other effects that do not discriminate in this fashion,
those non-discriminatory effects occur.

If a proposal has effects that, directly or indirectly, discriminate
against any player based on the voting record of that player, the author
of that proposal shall lose 20 points.

The determination as to whether a proposal has discriminatory effects
shall rest with the Administrator. The ruling of the Administrator may be
challenged via the CFI process.

This rule takes precedence over Rule 19.


The above is p1806/0.
spoon-business mailing list