Daniel Lepage on 30 Jan 2004 22:42:07 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 56 RESULTS |
On Jan 30, 2004, at 5:37 PM, Daniel Lepage wrote:
On Jan 30, 2004, at 4:59 PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:-Two things. The first is one of SkArcher's "NO" votes. The other is his other one. There were only two - one of them was shuffled off to proposal 1757.-Proposal 1770/0 (Once More, With Less Suckage) (Baron von Skippy):AFF: Baron von Skippy x2, bd, Mikie The Inscrutable, The Pusher Robot, ZarpintNEG: Glotmorf, Sagitta, SkArcher x3, Teucer, WonkoCounts (Y/N/A/S) : (6-6-0-0). Measure fails. Baron von Skippy loses 3 points.Good point. I hereby use the Balefire Rod to produce Balefire; I use the Balefire on vSET (note that the prop says nothing about needing to possess the Rod in order to use it).Thus, vSET ceased to exist at the beginning of the nweek 56 Voting Period. Which means it still doesn't exist now. So I can't have targeted it with Balefire, 'cause it's not there to be targeted.Which means I didn't destroy it, and it's still here, so it's not.I can't see any good reason why this won't constitute "the existence of a paradoxical condition that cannot be resolved under the current set of rules.", which is an emergency under rule 0 ;)Of course, since Dave misdid this vote, e hasn't published the correct voting results yet... so there's still time for em to veto it.
Oops, my mistake. I can't balefire vSET, 'cause it's a society. I use balefire as mentioned above to zap bd's "Looting the Corpse" card.Arguably, I could do it to the Watch, too, but it's slightly rule mandated...
-- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business