[Spoon-business] Re: [spoon-discuss] No actions?

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:05:21 -0500, Zarpint Jeremy Cook 
<mcfoufou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We can:
>
> 1. Just ignore the sentence and do nothing.
> 2. Just ignore this, and propose to remove the sentence.
> 3. Break r10, and remove the thing right now.
> 4. Have Dave break r10 and just remove the sentence.
> 5. Find some way within the game around the problem, e.g.
>
> In order for an action to be illegal by r1638, it must be "referenced".
> Referencing is an action undefined in the rules.
> If referencing is referenced in the rules, referencing cannot be done,
> and thus there is no problem with this rule.
> If it isn't, neither is anything else, since they are both stated 
> [English
> verb here, not Nomic] in the rules the same way, and there is no problem
> with this rule.
>
> Conclusion: There is no problem with this rule.
>
> Hey, cool! I like that.

I make a declaration of extreme cleverness, citing Zarpint the Incompletes 
solution to the r1638 conundrum.


SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business