| SkArcher on 23 Nov 2003 20:18:41 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] new object proposal |
I have a few minor comments: On Sunday, November 23, 2003, at 12:05 AM, Bill Adlam wrote:
E Possession No Game Object may possess a Player or Society. When an Action of a Player or Society creates a game object other than a Player or Society, the Object's creator possesses it. This subsection defers to all other rules that determine the possession of Objects.I disagree with this section - I see no reason why players shouldn't be able to possess each other (if you've read any of the records from before the repeal of the Grid, players could become Toads, which allowed other players to pick them up and carry them around; the Toads were said to be in the possession of the player carrying them).
Funny you should mention that Wonko, I was just wondering... when you made the grid go away, the definitions of 'Toad' and 'Penguin' disappeared along with it. Now IIRC, at the time the grid was repealed, the Baron was a penguin (or possibly a toad - i belive we were going to CFI the point, but it all became moot when you nuked the grid)
just on the off chance; I smear the Baron I eat the Baron SkArcher _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business