Re: [Spoon-business] Taking back the game

[Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:35:56 -0400, Rob Speer <rspeer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> As defined in the first paragraph of TPR's ruleset, there are no rules
> and everything is legal.
>
> Therefore, I change the ruleset to be just like the ruleset that is
> posted at http://www.nomic.net/~g6/static/rules.html, except that it is
> missing Rule 1592/0 and Rule 1637/0.
>
> I comment informatively that those former rules were entitled "Subgames"
> and "Sovereignty", respectively.

You seem to be confusing the rationale for my actions as part of the 
ruleset, which it is not (note that that text did not have a "Rule #" 
heading, therefore was not a rule). Since this qualifies as a dispute over 
the rules, I rule (per rule 6) that the ruleset consists of the text within 
the {{ }}-delimited block; therefore, your actions are invalid. (Don't 
worry, I fully intend to restore the ruleset once it's generally agreed 
that I win.)

Your Benevolent Dictator, The Pusher Robot
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business