bd on 1 Apr 2003 21:40:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Spoon-business] Re: [spoon-discuss] Prop 1417 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 31 March 2003 10:50 pm, Glotmorf wrote: > A problem I see with the proposed rule change: > > "I create an Insta-rule that says <such and such>." > > next nweek... > > "I throw my Insta-rule at Fred. > > I create an Insta-Rule that says <the opposite of the last one I created>. > > I throw my new Insta-Rule at Fred." > > This results in a Can of Whoopass going off at Fred's feet. At no cost to > the insta-rule maker. [[ Aw, it's more fun to leave these untill after it's passed ;) ]] Replace p141 with: {{ Append the following to rule 698: {{ If two insta-rules, one allowing an action and one disallowing the same action are located in the same grid space, both are destroyed and the effects of cracking open a Can of Whoopass are performed on that location. An insta-rule carried by a player on the grid is considered to be at the same location as the carrying player for the purposes of this paragraph and the next. If an insta-rule allowing an action is thrown at a location containing an insta-rule disallowing the same action, or vice versa, an adjacent square to the target is selected. If it is legal for the thrown insta-rule to land there, it does so instead. Otherwise, it lands on the original target. }} }} [[ So, it's repelled from the opposite, but if you're lucky you might bounce it off e.g. a Big Rock or something. ]] - -- bd You will be audited by the Internal Revenue Service. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+igcMx533NjVSos4RAvrTAJ4kcI+SVs/W/D9Z4D2HZV4Gxx90ygCeL68k LkCpLkrPUxLIjwzBMrdK8lg= =3xEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business