| bd on 1 Apr 2003 21:40:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Spoon-business] Re: [spoon-discuss] Prop 1417 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 March 2003 10:50 pm, Glotmorf wrote:
> A problem I see with the proposed rule change:
>
> "I create an Insta-rule that says <such and such>."
>
> next nweek...
>
> "I throw my Insta-rule at Fred.
>
> I create an Insta-Rule that says <the opposite of the last one I created>.
>
> I throw my new Insta-Rule at Fred."
>
> This results in a Can of Whoopass going off at Fred's feet. At no cost to
> the insta-rule maker.
[[ Aw, it's more fun to leave these untill after it's passed ;) ]]
Replace p141 with:
{{
Append the following to rule 698:
{{
If two insta-rules, one allowing an action and one disallowing the same action
are located in the same grid space, both are destroyed and the effects of
cracking open a Can of Whoopass are performed on that location. An insta-rule
carried by a player on the grid is considered to be at the same location as
the carrying player for the purposes of this paragraph and the next.
If an insta-rule allowing an action is thrown at a location containing an
insta-rule disallowing the same action, or vice versa, an adjacent square to
the target is selected. If it is legal for the thrown insta-rule to land
there, it does so instead. Otherwise, it lands on the original target.
}}
}}
[[ So, it's repelled from the opposite, but if you're lucky you might bounce
it off e.g. a Big Rock or something. ]]
- --
bd
You will be audited by the Internal Revenue Service.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+igcMx533NjVSos4RAvrTAJ4kcI+SVs/W/D9Z4D2HZV4Gxx90ygCeL68k
LkCpLkrPUxLIjwzBMrdK8lg=
=3xEu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business