Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 37 BALLOT

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>(by way of bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 24 March 2003 07:50 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 07:45  PM, bd wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Monday 24 March 2003 07:41 pm, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> >>>>>> Proposal 1396/0: In Memorial (The Voice)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No.  Don't make me get unbridledly hostile.
> >>>>
> >>>> I change my vote on this to YES, if it's not too late.
> >>>>
> >>>> I voted for most of these, IIRC.
> >>>
> >>> *points at various headers*
> >>
> >> Okay, that went over my head. What headers?
> >
> > Specifically, To:
>
> I think perhaps you think my above comment means that I think I voted
> in favor of most proposals on this nweek's Ballot. The 'these' I was
> referring to actually meant Uin's old 'scrap parts of the ruleset'
> things, and especially the 'repeal rule 10' ones. I personally feel
> that all of rule 10 is useless, and I do believe I voted for most of
> Uin's props to rescind it.
>
> If instead you're referring to my change of vote being posted to the
> -discuss list, well, it's legally cast as long as Dave actually reads
> it, 'cause then it counts as privately informing Dave.

[[ I was referring to that, yes, and it's not *privately* informing him. ]]
I create the following CFI:
{{
Votes or vote changes sent to forums available to the public as well as the
Administrator do not count as privately informing the administrator.
}}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+f7TZx533NjVSos4RAnskAKCso0dqqZWc95sA9XfQKeLnjRfwjgCdH2eW
7Rj2lLoWrppGyVDlNNLSNMk=
=HrrO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business