bd on 23 Mar 2003 19:37:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Action |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 March 2003 02:33 pm, Baron von Skippy wrote: > >Tequila gives 2d3 points o' charm; 24 is how many you need to ensure that > >you beat 45 charm. (actually, 23 would suffice). But if you get lucky > >rolls, 8 drinks'll do it. > > > >Given that Charm is also linked to nweekly allowances, I think we'd be > >better off changing the Tequila Rule. > > > >Not that I object to the above prop; I just think we need to do more to > > fix the problem. > > > >-- > >Wonko > > May I offer another option? This isn't meant to contradict Glotmorf's prop, > just to create some protective redundancy. > > I propose: > { > __Chug! Chug! Chug! Thud!__ > > If the proposal __Drinking Problem__ passed, add to the end of Rule 1081.B: > > "If a player drinks 6 alcoholic beverages in one nweek, or 4 alcoholic > beverages in one post to a public forum, or 4 alcoholic beverages in one > nweek after an nweek in which they drank at least 4 alcoholic beverages, > that player gets a Hangover of the Ages." > > Otherwise, add the text in quotes to Rule 1081 as a subsection titled "B. > Binging." > } [[ What order are props implemented in? ]] I propose the following rule: {{ __Order of operations__ Passed proposals are implemented in the order they were proposed in. }} - -- bd "If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff." - -- Dave Enyeart -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+fgzJx533NjVSos4RAolXAKCzDwzrQEoN3LJXJ8p3Iu/zhgOZzQCfaeRq cVQ7ao+g3kCOMTOvf+VWfg8= =BCIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business