Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 28 BALLOT

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth David E. Smith,

> The following measures are on the ballot for nweek 28:
> 
> Proposal 1239/1: Hey, Artifacts! (Wonko)
Yes. This is neater now, and will be very useful soon, I hope...

> Proposal 1240/1: Scarf it up! (Wonko)
Yes. Let the Scarf run free once more.

> Proposal 1241/1: Standard Abuses (Wonko)
Yes. Again, I hope to make use of these soon...

> Proposal 1245/0: Unix fixing (Wonko)
Shelve. I'll turn it into something else if it gets shelved; the prop is
meaningless now because resources have been standardized. But if it does
pass, I would like it if it could be rectified to have the correct revision
number. BTW, see the note at the bottom of this message.

> Proposal 1249/3: Races (Orc In a Spacesuit)
Yes. If Orc doesn't want this ministry, I may just try to get it myself, if
I ever finish this stupid program...

> Proposal 1250/0: Let's get them working right (Orc In a Spacesuit)
No. They are working right.

> Proposal 1253/0: Well, at least it's not another SOE...
> (The Administrator)
Yes. I don't think it's legal to implement part of it, but I'm beginning to
get irritated... I'm not a big fan of Imperial Nomic (unless I'm the
emperor, of course :)

> Proposal 1254/0: Speeder Upgrade Fixes (M-Tek)
Yes.

> Proposal 1255/2: Repeal Slowly and See (Anything McGee)
Alright, this one's long:
1. Yes - I see no point. If you want pseudocode, then legalize pseudocode.
Don't make workarounds.

2. No - Since Dave can stop any OL action, this isn't absurdly powerful, and
it's also potentially useful (as an alternative to a SOE)

3. No - C'mon, we just made 'em! Give 'em a chance to be useful before you
sack 'em. Although I wouldn't object to just sacking the Sith one - I only
proposed him because I wanted to follow, "When nine hundred years old you
reach..." with a proposal called "Look as good you will not".

4. Yes - They're cute, except not really. Enough.

5. No - They barely take up space, they're not irritating to work with, they
don't cause undo stress for anyone... Why sac 'em?

6. No - nobody's fixed it yet. I don't have time, and/or don't care enough
to spend time on it; everyone else seems to feel the same way. If nobody
wants to fix it, let it die.

> Proposal 1256/0: ...Or Would You Rather Be a Cogno-Intellectual?
> (Glotmorf)
Abstain. I wouldn't, but you can if you want.

> Proposal 1257/0: Reminders: Nomvivor (bd)
No. E can do it anyway. Without you getting 3d6 points for it.

> Proposal 1258/1: Step The Hell Down Already (Rob)
Yes. Go immutability conflicts.

> Proposal 1259/0: Executive Aids (Wonko)
Yes. I think they'll be very helpful

> Proposal 1260/0: Random Cleanups (The Administrator)
Yes.

> Proposal 1261/0: ...Or Would You Rather Be a Benevolent Activist?
> (Orc In a Spacesuit)
Abstain. I wouldn't prefer that, either.

> Proposal 1262/0: Sorry, We Don't Make House Calls (Glotmorf)
Yes. Although I could've sworn I put that in in the original upgrade prop; I
must have culled it by accident.

> Proposal 1263/0: That's Not Our Problem (Glotmorf)
Yes. Go realism.

> Proposal 1264/0: Cleanup on Aisle 1247! (Glotmorf)
No. That's an awfully small amount of work for 3d6 points and 1 charm.


*** The Note at the Bottom ***

This is directed to Dave, with regards to the 21/6 in one of my props. Why
is it that sometimes strings in proposals such as "21/6" become links to
their respective rules, but sometimes it doesn't happen? Do you go through
and do it yourself, or does one of your scripts do it, and if it is the
latter, what do I have to do to make a "21/6" turn into a link in the prop?
[[ That's why I keep including revision numbers ]]
-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business