Re: spoon-business: CFJ 690/0

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 18:27, you wrote:
<snip>
> As Glotmorf has repeatedly insisted, Charter Props are not normal Props.
> Because the Charter Rule says so, Charter Props are put on the Ballot and
> voted on. However, the Charter Rule does not account for the following
> things which they are excluded from by not being proposals:
> They don't recieve Serial Numbers (r5)
> They may attempt to temporarily circumvent the rules (r10)
> They may not be revised (r19)
> **They are not processed, nor do their actions take effect**, nor may they
> be vetoed, nor do they cause dimension changes to their proponents (r32)
> They need not be displayed for public review (r211)
> They may not be rectified by the admin to change 'day' to 'nday' (r257)
> They are not exempt from the Scarf's effects (r258)
> They may not modify the LOGAS (r260)

Additional analysis:
I quote rule 631/1:

 Groups, as defined in Rule Five-Seven-Eight, also known as Clubs, can be 
formed by a Player making a Charter Prop, which is like a normal prop. in 
that it's added to the nweek ballot and voted on. A Charter Prop, though, 
passes unless 2/3 of the votes it receives are against it.

It goes on to put more restrictions, but it does not say that the charter prop 
is different in that it has no effect.