spoon-business: Revision and a new proposal

[Eric Gerlach <egerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Firtht of all, I'd like to revithe my propothal that leth people leave the 
Grid:

REVITHION
=========

Revithe propothal 543 to read:
{{
__Mommy, I want off!!__

Revise Rule 301 in the following manner:

1) Add the following text to the end of paragraph 8 (the one about entering 
the grid):

"A Player may leave the Grid by announcing on a public Forum eir intention 
to do so, however, a player may only leave the Grid if e was on the Grid at 
the beginning of the nweek."

2) Change the text:

"A Player may enter the Grid by announcing on a public Forum that e will 
enter the Grid at a particular (x,y) coordinate location."

to:

"A Player may enter the Grid by announcing on a public Forum that e will 
enter the Grid at a particular (x,y) coordinate location, however, a player 
may only enter the Grid if e was in Limbo at the beginning of the nweek."
}}

PROPOTHAL
=========

Now, for a new propothal:

{{
__Can we talk about this later, honey?__

{{
__Shelving a topic__

A Player may vote "SHELVE" for a proposal on a ballot.  For the purposes of 
vote counting, votes of "SHELVE" count as votes against the 
proposal.  However, if the proposal fails no effects occur, as if the 
proposal had not failed.  This rule supercedes rules 124 and 154 in this 
regard.  Instead, at the beginning of the next nweek [[ recall that 
counting happens during the same nweek as voting ]], a new proposal is 
created which has the same text as did the final revision of the proposal 
that failed.  This proposal is treated as if it had been proposed by the 
original proposal's proponent.

If a proposal is vetoed by the Administrator, this rule does not affect 
that proposal.
}}

[[ This allows us to postpone otherwise good proposals until the next nweek 
if they have fatal, fatal bugs in them, rather than the proponent losing 
charm and points, not to menation having to repropose. ]]

}}