Karin L. Kross on 5 Feb 2002 20:45:07 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: CFJ 338 - Judgement |
CFJ 338 (Judge: Congenital Optimist) CFJ by Scoff! STATEMENT: The Administrator can not refuse to recognize any action posted to a public forum, except where such non-recognition is explicitly permitted by the rules. Scoff!'s analysis: It's not a rule, but it certainly should be. The alternative gives *way* too much power of discretion to the Administrator. If eir least-favorite player posts a Grid move to a square that has a Shiny thing, can e ignore the move to prevent said player receiving points? This whole ignoring-an-action thing sets up an unwelcome precedent. Ruling: UNDECIDED Analysis: On the one hand, Scoff!'s argument has considerable weight; on the other hand, I think that the administrator should have *some* authority over the game. I can't seem to find anything where the administrator's legal rights and responsibilities are spelled out (and if there are, please let me know). I feel that this is not an issue that can be solved in a CFJ; it should be resolved in a proposal defining the Admin's rights. For what it's worth, I think that even with the system of CFJs in place, we do need an administrator as a "measure of last resort" when something goes truly haywire. But that's just my opinion. -Congenital Optimist -- karinlee@xxxxxx | http://seishonagon.org "don't you know there ain't no devil there's just god when he's drunk" (Tom Waits "Heartattack and Vine")